> On Dec 3, 2019, at 12:59 PM, Paul Berger via cctalk <[email protected]> > wrote: > > ... > Would TIFF G4 still be preferable to JPEG2000? It would seem I can control > the compression used by selecting the pdf compatibility level. JPEG2000 apparently has a lossless mode (says Wikipedia). If so, it would be acceptable as an alternative to other lossless compressions. If used in lossy mode, it's not suitable for scanned documents, just as regular JPEG isn't. paul
- Re: Scanning docs for bitsavers Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- Re: Scanning docs for bitsavers Alan Perry via cctalk
- Re: Scanning docs for bitsavers Al Kossow via cctalk
- Re: Scanning docs for bitsavers Alexandre Souza via cctalk
- Re: Scanning docs for bitsavers Al Kossow via cctalk
- Re: Scanning docs for bitsavers Jay Jaeger via cctalk
- Re: Scanning docs for bitsavers Eric Smith via cctalk
- Re: Scanning docs for bitsavers Christian Corti via cctalk
- Re: Scanning docs for bitsavers Eric Smith via cctalk
- Re: Scanning docs for bitsavers Paul Berger via cctalk
- Re: Scanning docs for bitsavers Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: Scanning docs for bitsavers Eric Smith via cctalk
- Re: Scanning docs for bitsavers Dennis Boone via cctalk
- Re: Scanning docs for bitsavers Guy Dunphy via cctalk
- Re: Scanning docs for bitsavers Grant Taylor via cctalk
- Re: Scanning docs for bitsavers Alexandre Souza via cctalk
- Re: Scanning docs for bitsavers Grant Taylor via cctalk
- Re: Scanning docs for bitsaver... Grant Taylor via cctalk
- Re: Scanning docs for bit... Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: Scanning docs for... Fred Cisin via cctalk
- Re: Scanning docs for bitsaver... Eric Smith via cctalk
