> On May 18, 2020, at 5:20 PM, Electronics Plus via cctalk > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Do you guys want original LK201s, or other keyboards that LOOK like LK201s > in the caps and layout, or converters? > I am a little confused... LK201 clones do not have the clip offset on the > terminal connector, so you would have to replace the connector. I have no > idea if the protocol, voltage, etc is the same. I think you're confused between terminals and keyboards. LK201 keyboards don't have offset clips (MMJ connectors). Instead, they use a standard telephone handset connector. What I was talking about is a way to use a PC USB keyboard in place of an LK201, when your last remaining real LK201 has just failed. That involves a USB jack, a LK201-compatible handset jack, some electronics, and software to speak the protocols involved. That's what I have just prototyped. paul
- Re: LK201 emulation Todd Goodman via cctalk
- Re: LK201 emulation Warner Losh via cctalk
- Re: LK201 emulation Ron Pool via cctalk
- Re: LK201 emulation Lars Brinkhoff via cctalk
- Re: LK201 emulation Peter Coghlan via cctalk
- Re: LK201 emulation Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: LK201 emulation Warner Losh via cctalk
- Re: LK201 emulation Peter Coghlan via cctalk
- Re: LK201 emulation Sophie Haskins via cctalk
- RE: LK201 emulation Electronics Plus via cctalk
- Re: LK201 emulation Paul Koning via cctalk
- Re: LK201 emulation Ethan Dicks via cctalk
- Re: LK201 emulation Warner Losh via cctalk
- RE: LK201 emulation Electronics Plus via cctalk
- Re: LK201 emulation Ethan Dicks via cctalk
- Re: LK201 emulation Steve Malikoff via cctalk
- Re: LK201 emulation sales--- via cctalk
- Re: LK201 emulation Ethan Dicks via cctalk
- Re: LK201 emulation Ethan Dicks via cctalk
- Re: LK201 emulation David Kuder via cctalk
- Re: LK201 emulation Lars Brinkhoff via cctalk
