On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 3:47 PM Peter Coghlan via cctalk < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 May 2020 at 15:18:34 -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > The topic for my talk next week. Unix had virtualization in 74. The > >> second > >> > Unix port ran under OS/360's VM in 78. > >> > > >> > >> What do you mean by "Unix had virtualization"? > >> > > > > I mean that 4th edition UNIX ran under a hypervisor in MERT in 74 as a > > process in that real-time executive. > > > > Oh. I thought maybe you meant Unix was able to do virtualization. > > What's special about being able to run under a hypervisor? If the > hypervisor does it's job right, whatever is running under it should > not be aware that it is not running directly on hardware. > MERT was more a real-time executive than a hypervisor, so there was some work needed to port UNIX to run as a process in MERT. The port was the unix kernel, so that programs could have a UNIX API. It wasn't a pure hypervisor, though, since a number of changes were required to Unix itself to cope with running in what we'd likely call a paravirtualized environment. >> Come to think of it, what do you mean by "OS/360's VM"? > >> > > > > IBM's standard VM/360. Sorry for the confusion. > > > > CP/67 or something like that maybe? I don't think there was a VM/360 > either. > Sorry, it was VM/370, so the successor to CP/67 with virtual memory added. https://akapugs.blog/2018/05/12/370unixpart2/ Warner
