>I hadn't thought about IBMCACHE.SYS in *years*. I wrote it in its>entirety >(there's even a patent that covers some of its operation). I>was in an AdTech >(Advanced Technology) group at the time and was>looking at how to make disk >operations faster in >DOS at the time when I>came up with the idea.>There was >a *huge* battle within IBM on if it >should be released and in>order to do so, >it was fairly well hidden.Guy,It is so well hidden I don't think I have ever >seen it. Was it part of pc-dos? If so what version?-Ali
- RE: history is hard (was: Micro... Tom Gardner via cctalk
- RE: history is hard (was: M... Fred Cisin via cctalk
- Re: history is hard (was: Micro... Jecel Assumpcao Jr via cctalk
- Re: history is hard (was: M... Fred Cisin via cctalk
- Re: history is hard (w... Jecel Assumpcao Jr via cctalk
- Re: history is har... Fred Cisin via cctalk
- Re: history is har... Liam Proven via cctalk
- Re: history is har... Guy Sotomayor via cctalk
- Re: history is har... Liam Proven via cctalk
- Re: history is har... Guy Sotomayor via cctalk
- Re: history is har... Ali via cctalk
- Re: history is har... Guy Sotomayor via cctalk
- Re: history is har... Fred Cisin via cctalk
- Re: history is har... Guy Sotomayor via cctalk
- Re: history is hard Evan Koblentz via cctalk
- Re: Microsoft open sources GWBASIC John Ames via cctalk
- Re: Microsoft open sources GWBASIC Liam Proven via cctalk
- Re: Microsoft open sources GWBASIC Jecel Assumpcao Jr via cctalk
- Re: Microsoft open sources GWBA... John Foust via cctalk
- Re: Microsoft open sources ... ben via cctalk
- Re: Microsoft open sou... Norman Jaffe via cctalk
