Sent from my iPhone. > On May 31, 2020, at 7:50 PM, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 5/31/20 2:24 AM, Eric Smith via cctalk wrote: >> On the other hand, Intel also had a FORTRAN-80 product, which was unrelated >> to Microsoft FORTRAN-80. Intel FOTRAN-80 ran on their MDS development >> systems under the ISIS-II operating system, and the compiler was written in >> PL/M. > > Which is even funnier when you realize that the PL/M compiler > was written in Fortran. > > bill As I recall, it was the cross compiler for PL/M that was written in FORTRAN. But that came first, before any 8080-hosted PL/M compiler.
- Re: Microsoft open sources ... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- Re: Microsoft open sources ... Chuck Guzis via cctalk
- Re: Microsoft open sources ... Boris Gimbarzevsky via cctalk
- Re: Microsoft open sources ... cclist--- via cctalk
- Re: Microsoft open sources GWBA... Fred Cisin via cctalk
- Re: Microsoft open sources ... John Foust via cctalk
- PC Fortran (Was: Microsoft ... Fred Cisin via cctalk
- Re: PC Fortran (Was: Micros... Eric Smith via cctalk
- Re: PC Fortran (Was: Micros... Fred Cisin via cctalk
- Re: PC Fortran (Was: Micros... Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
- Re: PC Fortran (Was: Micros... Mich.com via cctalk
- Re: PC Fortran (Was: Micros... Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
- Re: PC Fortran (Was: Micros... Mich.com via cctalk
- Re: PC Fortran (Was: Micros... Eric Smith via cctalk
- Re: PC Fortran (Was: Micros... Mark Linimon via cctalk
- Re: Microsoft open sources GWBASIC Toby Thain via cctalk
- Re: Microsoft open sources GWBASIC Liam Proven via cctalk
