Hi, I'd like to apologize for referring to the OCR of the Byte article as a "fairly bad OCR". I was thinking of the garbled sections that may be the result of trying to OCR graphics.
The vast majority of the text comes across clearly, and I don't want to insult whoever volunteered their time to do the OCR'ing ... I know how tedious it can be! I've been spoiled by OCR programs that produce their output as pdfs with searchable text, and should have remembered the results I get when I look at just their text! Stan
