On Wed, 2021-06-23 at 13:36 -0400, Paul Koning via cctalk wrote: > Typical FORTH implementations are neat in that respect, since they > use a threaded code encoding that allows for fast and efficient > switching between threaded code (subroutine calls) and straight > machine code.
I have a vague recollection of a story about a FORTH processor that put the addresses of the functions to be executed on the return-address stack (68000?) and then executed a RETURN instruction.
