And agin people ask. (Us included!)... which processor is the true first... the all white and gold... or... the white and gold with leads showing thru... Intel pictures the leads show labeing through in publicity stuff.... it does look better in a photo... some Collectors say the white and gold ( but it seems that is the one they personally own)...... we are fortunate to have been presented a white and gold this year. But unclear how to label the TRUE chronology ... we do have a black one but we all know that is a later one.... thanks for any insight.
Sent from the all new AOL app for Android On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 10:51 AM, Paul Koning via cctalk<cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote: The Wall St. Journal had a good essay about that, by Andy Kessler. This link should get you there: https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-chip-that-changed-the-world-microprocessor-computing-transistor-breakthrough-intel-11636903999?st=nm37ik74mq9vp51&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink <https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-chip-that-changed-the-world-microprocessor-computing-transistor-breakthrough-intel-11636903999?st=nm37ik74mq9vp51&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink> The subtitle is "Most of the wealth created since 1971 is a result of Intel’s 4004 microprocessor" which seems extravagant until you read his arguments. I still remember the 4004-based personal computer a college classmate of mine designed and built in 1974. It was a large (DEC Unibus hex module sized) wire wrap board with about 100 chips on it. And it worked. Slowly, but it could do useful programs. paul > On Nov 16, 2021, at 12:30 PM, Zane Healy via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> > wrote: > > It looks like the Intel 4004 turned 50 yesterday. > > Zane > > >
