> On Oct 6, 2022, at 12:51 AM, Rodney Brown via cctalk <[email protected]> > wrote: > > According to gcc-9.1.0/NEWS Intel i860 was an architecture declared obsolete > in GCC 4.0 (and previously in GCC 3.1). GCC does this in two steps. One is that it's marked as obsolete but can still be built, you just get a warning. The second is that the bits are actually removed. If you want to run something old, it's probably still good until that final removal. But given the lack of maintenance that triggers removal, it is certainly possible that there are some "bit rot" bugs before that point, possibly even before the first warning stage. paul
- [cctalk] Re: i860 vs. i960... Ali via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: i860 vs. i960... Stefan Skoglund via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: i860 vs. i960 WAS... Liam Proven via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: i860 vs. i960 WAS... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: i860 vs. i960 WAS... Eric Smith via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Intel's i860, Cray-On-A-Chip Christian Groessler via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Intel's i860, Cray-On-A-Chip Stefan Skoglund via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Intel's i860, Cray-On-A-C... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Intel's i860, Cray-On... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Intel's i860, Cray-On-A-Chip Rodney Brown via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Intel's i860, Cray-On-A-C... Paul Koning via cctalk
