Amen!

On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 7:17 PM William Donzelli via cctalk <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Own your land.
>
> Museum or individual.
>
> --
> Will
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 7:13 PM Kevin Parker via cctalk
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I remember that Sellam and I remember visiting your facility on a trip
> my wife and I did to the US. It was very impressive collection and that’s
> an understatement.
> >
> > It’s a shame all that was lost ☹ It served to reinforce my approach to
> this s tuff, grab first ask questions later otherwise it becomes landfill.
> >
> > Apologies if this is not appropriate for this list but your landlord was
> a flog.
> >
> >
> > Kevin Parker
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sellam Abraham via cctalk <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Monday, 17 October 2022 19:55
> > To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <
> [email protected]>
> > Cc: Sellam Abraham <[email protected]>
> > Subject: [cctalk] Re: Great Vintage Computer Heist of 2012
> >
> > Long story very short:
> >
> > Landlords evicted me from their warehouse where my collection was stored
> and wouldn't let me back in.  Had to go to court.  Regained access and was
> able to pull out 20% of the collection before they locked me out again for
> good.  Then sold the rest to computer recyclers, who proceeded to scatter
> it to the wind.
> >
> > Sellam
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 1:43 AM Ali via cctalk <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > You had to ask......I was there 3000 years ago (or about 10 years ago
> > > in non Tolkien meme terms) and it wasn't pretty....
> > > -------- Original message --------From: Tom Hunter via cctalk <
> > > [email protected]> Date: 10/17/22  1:31 AM  (GMT-08:00) To:
> > > "General
> > > Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <[email protected]> Cc:
> > > Tom Hunter <[email protected]> Subject: [cctalk] Great Vintage
> > > Computer Heist of 2012 Sellam Abraham referred to a "Great
> > > VintageComputer Heist of 2012". What was that about? Who stole what
> and where andwhy?
> >
>

Reply via email to