Let me add that Howard Sturgis' dissertation "Post-mortem for a
Time-sharing System" is great reading.  It's unusual that failures are
documented but this case study is worthy.



On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 1:00 PM <[email protected]> wrote:

> Send cctalk mailing list submissions to
>         [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or
> body 'help' to
>         [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of cctalk digest..."Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: CAL TSS information and source listings ([email protected])
>    2. ISO someone to refurbish two IBM 010 card punches (LJW cctech)
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 16:13:06 -0000
> Subject: [cctalk] Re: CAL TSS information and source listings
> Lars Brinkhoff wrote:
> > Paul McJones posted this recently:
> > https://mcjones.org/CalTSS/
> >
> > There aren't a lot of machine readable media, but many listings:
> > https://mcjones.org/CalTSS/source/
>
> I hesitated to post here -- was the CDC 6400 a classic computer? :-) --
> but Lars broke the ice. The system ran on a 6400 with Extended Core Storage
> and Central Exchange Jump (most of the operating system ran on the CPU,
> counter to normal CDC 6000 practice). The project took place at UC Berkeley
> between 1968 and 1971 (although hardware acquisition began in 1966). What
> the university really wanted was simple interactive service (editing,
> BASIC, remote job submission, etc.) in conjunction with batch jobs running
> on SCOPE on the main, larger 6400, but what they got was a state-of-the-art
> research system offering capability-based protection, multiple protection
> domains per process, and more. Unfortunately, it couldn't support enough
> concurrent users to be economical.
>
> The technical ideas are well-described here:
>
> Butler W. Lampson and Howard E. Sturgis. Reflections on an operating
> system design. Communications of the ACM, 19(5):251-265, January 1976.
> https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/360051.360074 (open access)
>
> The project history is described here:
>
> Paul McJones and Dave Redell. History of the CAL Timesharing System.
> Submitted to: IEEE Annals of the History of Computing.
> https://www.mcjones.org/CalTSS/paper/cal_tss_history.pdf
>
> Through heroic effort, Terry Heidelberg has managed to create an emulation
> environment and boot the system and run some programs, but it's not ready
> for prime time!
>
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: LJW cctech <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 18:05:58 +0200
> Subject: [cctalk] ISO someone to refurbish two IBM 010 card punches
> Hello all,
>
> Is there anyone out there that would be prepared to tackle restoring
> a couple of IBM 010 card punches functionally and cosmetically?
>
> This is a paying job!
>
> These are the small tabletop units.
>   One is manual: https://flic.kr/p/2nVAJeg
>   The other is motorised: https://flic.kr/p/2nVB8Pa
>
> They are apparently complete but will need cleaning, repainting and
> adjusting, and whatever you can do with the key-tops.
>
> The manual one was used by the current owner in 1962 so has some
> sentimental value!
>
> They are in the USA but we can get them to you wherever you are.
>
> If you know of anyone who might be interested then feel free to
> forward this email.
>
> --
> Lawrence Wilkinson                             [email protected]
> The IBM 360/30 page                   http://www.ljw.me.uk/ibm360
>

Reply via email to