As you say, to each his/her own.

But although mechanical devices are indeed more prone to issues, the same
argument could be applied to the rest of the system; when your unobtainium
PAL or LSI chip fails you'll probably replace it with a modern replacement.

Just a question of where you choose to draw the line.

Personally, I just spent some time this weekend reviving some obscure IMI
hard drives that hadn't been run for at least 25 years and it was a real
delight to not only get them going again but to discover that one had a
functional OS installation on it that I thought I'd lost long ago.

I suppose there's some of that the very first time you get your Gesswein
emulator working, but it ain't the same thing.

Another issue is that I have several hundred floppy disks, some with fairly
rare stuff on them; maybe I'll get around to archiving them some day but in
the meantime they're fairly safe on disk (unlike the box full of extremely
rare Burroughs paper tapes that I threw out before I discovered that there
are folks who are actually interested in that kind of old crap  ;-)

m

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 9:38 AM Bill Gunshannon via cctalk <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On 1/23/2023 9:02 AM, Mike Stein via cctalk wrote:
> > Agreed; might as well just replace the whole system with an emulator
> while
> > you're at it.
> >
> > m
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 3:41 AM Christian Corti via cctalk <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 21 Jan 2023, Bill Gunshannon wrote:
> >>> Later today I plan to try FlashFloppy.  My goal is to eventually
> >>> replace all of my mechanical floppies with solid state ones.
> >> Why would one want to do that?
> >> My goal would be the opposite. Upgrade all vintage computers with floppy
> >> drives ;-) My experience is that, if handled correctly, floppies are one
> >> of the most durable media, and they are definitely more fun on vintage
> >> equipment than any form of modern replacement. For exchanging data
> between
> >> the new and the old world, maybe it can be an option. But for classic
> >> computing? No way I would replace a floppy drive if it isn't broken.
> >>
> >> Christian
>
>
> To each his own.  My interest is not in museum pieces that stand on a shelf
>
> and look pretty.  I like to actually work with them.  Mechanical disk
> drives
>
> are so old today they are prone to constant failure.  None of my
> original TRS-80
>
> drives still function.  If I replace them with TEAC FD55's they are no
> longer
>
> original so what difference is there if I replace them with a GOTEK and
> USB Stick?
>
> And the disks themselves become unreliable with repeated use. The
> replacements
>
> also allow for trying things the mechanical disks are incapable of.
> Like really large
>
> floppies with255 tracks.
>
>
> bill
>
>

Reply via email to