I once heard a story from someone* who was told by a journalist that while
said journalist was interviewing Richard Stallman he was [WARNING: GRAPHIC
CONTENT COMMENCES HERE] picking the jam from between his toes and eating it.

Make of that what you will, but if that isn't just a slander, that's the
guy upon whose legacy everyone is relying.

Sellam

* remaining nameless

On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 3:59 PM Ken Seefried via cctalk <
[email protected]> wrote:

> FSF hasn't done anything in at least a decade, but someone from there "is
> still around", so they're somehow relevant.  People who actually are doing
> something (e.g litigating) are dismissed because you "don't know these
> people" (aside: there's someone who cares about open source who doesn't
> know who the EFF is?).  But someone not previously mentioned is doing
> something, so...look! squirrel!?
>
> No wonder GPL violators operate with impunity.
>
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 3:13 AM Alexander Huemer via cctalk <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 09:25:31PM -0400, Ken Seefried wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 12:32 PM Alexander Huemer via cctalk <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 11:05:41PM +0800, Tom Hunter via cctalk
> wrote:
> > > > > FSF does not enforce anything.
> > > >
> > > > https://gpl-violations.org/
> > > > They do though.
> > > >
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > >
> > > Go to 'News' on that site and the last news about an enforcement action
> > was
> > > from 2013.
> >
> > True.
> > Though, Harald Welte, the person behind the project is still very active
> > in the free software community and surely happy to help.
> >
> > > If you actually want to pursue GPL violations, especially if it's
> related
> > > to a non-FSF sponsored project, you'll have better luck with the EFF or
> > > appealing to someone like Popehat/Ken White to help find some *pro
> bono *
> > > representation.
> >
> > That might be the case, I don't know these people.
> > There is also the SFC[1] who are currently attacking John Deere for
> > violating the GPL in their farm equipment[2], which is kind of a big
> > deal.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > [1] https://sfconservancy.org/
> > [2] https://lwn.net/Articles/926330/
> >
>

Reply via email to