Half the time, I hear from my family, "why do you spend all this time
working with obsolete stuff?"

The other half, I hear, "if you can do it, why can't I? Don't make it
complicated, just tell me the two or three steps I need to do."

On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 10:28 PM David C. Jenner via cctalk <
[email protected]> wrote:

> You mean you don't have an old Mac that can do all this?  I just went
> through collecting old data on 3 old Mac OS X versions and Mac OS 9 on a
> G4 tower that's 25 years old.  It also runs an older, very expensive
> Nikon film scanner that works great.  Networking on this still works
> great, and I can send to newer Macs/Windows as needed.
>
> Dave
>
> On 1/31/25 2:29 PM, Zane Healy via cctalk wrote:
> > On Jan 31, 2025, at 11:24 AM, Cameron Kelly via cctalk <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm glad Microsoft is paying respects to their history. It feels like
> Apple barely does, or acts as if things that they produced before their
> current product cycle don't exist.
> >
> > My primary problem is that they do things that are openly hostile to
> those of us that have been running on the Mac for 30+ years.  Recently I
> needed to access some older data, and it turned into a large project when I
> discovered that not only couldn’t newer versions of MacOS not access the
> floppies, they couldn’t access Mac CD-R’s.  I ended up copying everything
> over to a Hard Drive 100’s of floppies and CD’s from DOS and Mac.  Then I
> discovered that the latest version of Microsoft Office *ON THE MAC* can’t
> read MS Office 4.2 documents (such as MS Word 6.0).  In the end I had to
> create emulation environments for my old Mac and DOS systems on my current
> Mac laptop.  It’s been useful having access to the original dBase
> databases, rather than trying to access the converted FileMaker Pro
> databases.
> >
> > Of course prior to this, in the early days of Mac OS X, they dropped
> support for AppleTalk, then AppleTalk printing.  Then MacOS 9 apps, and now
> more recently 32-bit MacOS Apps.
> >
> > Of course Windows isn’t perfect for Backwards compatibility, a lot of us
> have to keep Windows XP running (in my case as a VM on my 2010 Mac Pro), in
> order to drive things like vintage film scanners.
> >
> > Zane
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to