https://www.eenewseurope.com/en/raspberry-pi-spins-its-rp2350-adds-5v-support/ 
was my point of departure, doubtless a recycled press release.

I shall agree that something is non-coformant, and based on your observations, 
that the documentation is probably already on that list with probability 1.

Martin

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Koning [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 30 July 2025 18:47
To: Martin Bishop <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [cctalk] RP2350 5V Input Tollerant Pins



> On Jul 30, 2025, at 1:35 PM, Martin Bishop 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Your caveat that the data sheet requires careful study is completely correct. 
>  Also, the 5V tollerance applies to the A4 revision, date codes / top marks 
> will also require scrutiny.  I would suspect that A4 2050's are not yet "on 
> the streets".

It doesn't say that in the revision history chapter.  Instead, it doesn't say 
at all, which makes people wonder if this is a documentation fix for something 
that always was there, a now documented capability because of better chip 
qualification, or if it really is a revision dependent feature that isn't 
correctly documented as such?

        paul
> 
> FWIW my low tech TTL --> LVTTL input interface design is a 3v0 Zenner clamp
> 
> Martin
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Koning via cctalk [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: 30 July 2025 16:46
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Paul Koning <[email protected]>
> Subject: [cctalk] Re: RP2350 5V Input Tollerant Pins
> 
> There's a small detail that's in the document: some of the GPIO pins double 
> as analog inputs (for the ADC).  Those, unlike the other GPIO (digital only) 
> pins, are not 5 volt tolerant.  Four of the GPIO pins brought out to the edge 
> of the Raspberry Pico board are those analog/digital combo pins, so for any 5 
> volt work you'd have to avoid directly connecting 5 volt devices.
> 
> paul
> 
>> On Jul 30, 2025, at 12:30 PM, Paul Koning via cctalk <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> That's interesting.  I have been using the RP2350 for a while now but I 
>> missed that detail.
>> 
>> For what I do, I've found that just a voltage divider works fine for 3 volt 
>> tolerant inputs with 5 volt drive.  And 5 volt TTL seems to be happy with 
>> the 3 volt logic high that the Pico chips produce.  So while voltage 
>> shifters are well known I haven't found the need for them.
>> 
>> Still this is handy to know.
>> 
>> The RP2350 is quite an amazing chip for very little money.  A dollar or two 
>> more than the RP2040, which itself is already highly capable.  By the way, 
>> there is a very nice FORTH system for these called Zeptoforth; I've been 
>> doing a bunch of work with that.
>> 
>> paul
>> 
>>> On Jul 30, 2025, at 10:04 AM, Martin Bishop via cctalk 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> https://www.raspberrypi.com/products/rp2350/
>>> 
>>> From postings, I know that folks use the RP2350 for interfacing; the trade 
>>> press has been shipping news of RP's rev A4 datasheet in volume.
>>> 
>>> The datasheet should tell all.  However, the 5V tollerance of the "IO" pins 
>>> is significant for its simplification of TTL interfacing; the maximum 
>>> supply and output voltage remains 3v3.  See section 14.8.2 (p 1335) et seq 
>>> - NB the FT indication.
>>> 
>>> Martin
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to