Thanks for the reply. No, I merely threw ESpeak out there as an example. Any 
Linux speech synthesizer would work. The only one synthesizer I wouldn’t 
recommend is, as you mentioned, the online ones. That would make it dependent 
on an internet connection and not as self-contained as I would imagine. Sadly, 
I no longer own a hardware synthesizer of my own. I did have a working one but 
gave it to a friend who was in need of one. I have been searching EBay, without 
luck, for another. That is interesting about musicians. I never knew that. Well 
hopefully someone who is versed in this type of software development may want 
to take up this project.
Frank


> On Sep 15, 2025, at 4:37 AM, Adrian Godwin via cctalk <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Do you think espeak is the most suitable, or just a convenient example ?
> A friend's commercial product used a system from Lernout & Houspie but it's
> also something the current AI craze does moderately well (most of the time,
> anyway..), often using an online server.
> 
> There are several open source choices too, as well as espeak and those
> fairly expensive commercial systems.
> 
> I have collected a couple of external synths - A Votrax and a later DECTalk
> than the one in your link. I understand these are also in demand by
> musicians for their characteristic sound. I don't know if that's another
> market for your idea - I would have thought a DAW would provide a good
> environment for a software synth but they seem to like the DECTalk.
> 

Reply via email to