> On Oct 27, 2025, at 6:26 AM, Christian Corti via cctalk > <[email protected]> wrote: > > It seems that nowadays you can't get *any* replacement for failing DEC 3639 > aka 2N3639 transistors. All parts are obsolete and unobtanium, e.g. 2N3640, > PN3640, MMBT3640 and so on. > > So, what can be used instead? The most important electrical parameter is the > storage time. It needs to be *very* low, around 20-30 ns. > > Does it mean that a failing PDP-8 will stay a dead PDP-8 from now on? > > Christian Have you tried with an ordinary switching transistor that's readily available? I'm surprised at that storage time, why would it need to be that low for a machine that runs at just a couple of MHz? paull
- [cctalk] Replacements for DEC 3639 Christian Corti via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Replacements for DEC 3639 StricK via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Replacements for DEC 3639 Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Replacements for DEC 3639 Christian Corti via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Replacements for DEC ... Brent Hilpert via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Replacements for ... Jon Elson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Replacements... Mattis Lind via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Replacements for DEC 3639 ben via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Replacements for DEC 3639 Jon Elson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Replacements for DEC 3639 Jon Elson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Replacements for DEC 3639 Christian Corti via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Replacements for DEC ... Jon Elson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Replacements for ... Christian Corti via cctalk
