> On Nov 30, 2025, at 14:19, Adrian Godwin <[email protected]> wrote: > > No, it's a scanned listing from a patent. I think it's on the Australian ho > museum site. But that does make me wonder if preprocessing the input image > files would be faster than postprocessing the text output files. If the scan you have is not very good, an option would be to contact the patent office for a copy. It may well be a copy direct from their archives is cleaner than what you have now. paul
- [cctalk] OCR and line printers Guy Fedorkow via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: OCR and line printers David Wade via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: OCR and line printers Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: OCR and line printers Gordon Henderson via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: OCR and line printers bostjan spetic via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: OCR and line printers Adrian Godwin via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: OCR and line printer... Wayne S via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: OCR and line pri... Adrian Godwin via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: OCR and lin... Wayne S via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: OCR and... Wayne S via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: OCR... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: OCR... Adrian Godwin via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: OCR... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: OCR... Marc Howard via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: OCR... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: OCR and line printer... The Doctor via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: OCR and line pri... Adrian Godwin via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: OCR and lin... Wayne S via cctalk
