in fact, the version from the Don Maslin archive labels itself as 2.11, without additional letters. Where does the information about 2.11d and 2.11e come from?
вт, 9 июн. 2026 г., 00:56 Robert Feldman via cctalk <[email protected]>: > > On 6/8/26 7:40 AM, Fred Cisin wrote: > > On Sun, 7 Jun 2026, Robert Feldman via cctalk wrote: > >> Does anyone have a working copy of a bootable Otrona Attache MS-DOS > >> 2.11d or 2.11e disk that they can copy and snail-mail to me? All of > >> my disks are giving a "Bad or missing Command Interpreter" error. I > >> no longer have another computer that reads/writes 5 1/4" IBM 360KB > >> disks, so I need a physical copy. > >> Please email me at [email protected] so we can arrange shipping > >> (I am in Chicago) and payment. > >> Thanks, > >> Bob Feldman > > > > If and when you can get access to amacine with a drive and internet, try > > > > www.retroarchive.org/maslin > > > > Don Maslin (1927 - 2004) had a wondrous collection of system/boot disks > > > > We all miss him > > > > -- > > Grumpy Ol' Fred > > > Fred, > > Yes. The first thing I did was look in the Maslin Archive to see if a > copy of the Otrona MS-DOS is available. There is a copy in the archive. > Most likely is is 2.11d, as 2.11e was circulated by FAUG after Otrona > went out of business. Reportedly 2.11e has support for hard drives, but > I can use either 2.11d or 2.11e. > > Bob > > >
