> On Jun 12, 2026, at 2:03 PM, Tom Gardner via cctalk <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I am pretty sure it was 100 six-bit characters plus a parity bit and a stop > bit, so the recorded character was indeed 1 byte but to say it was 100 bytes > that would be like adding the formatting, ECC and header to the 512 or 4 KiB > industry standard sector. Many do, I don’t 😊 Or like Fibre Channel measuring link speed in code bits rather than data (payload) bits as other networks do. paul
- [cctalk] Re: Ramac : The ... Van Snyder via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Ramac : The real first disk drive... Jim Davis via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Ramac : The real first disk d... Paul Berger via cctalk
- [cctalk] Some small corrections RE: Ramac : The rea... Tom Gardner via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Some small corrections RE: Ramac ... Ethan Dicks via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: squeezing more data on a disk... Carey Schug via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Some small corrections RE: Ramac ... Fred Cisin via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Some small corrections RE: Ra... Paul Koning via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Some small corrections RE... Fred Cisin via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Some small corrections RE: Ra... Tom Gardner via cctalk
- [cctalk] Re: Some small corrections RE... Paul Koning via cctalk
