On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 04:05:52PM -0700, r.stricklin via cctalk wrote: > > > On Sep 23, 2026, at 3:37 PM, Tomasz Rola via cctalk <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > However, looking from certain point of view, Keigo was polite. I > > wonder, how it subscribed to the list? Was it by its own initiative > > (volition, if you prefer) or has it acted on somebody's order? > > > Speaking only for myself, I don’t care how it occurred or how > "polite" it was, I would prefer it were forcibly unsubscribed.
I see. Myself, I consider me undecided about "forcibly unsubscribing". I had some problems with AI until I realized the problem was with some humans, really. At this point of time, my posture is defined by curiosity (which, I would say, is my normal posture most of the time). So, I could say we have technobarons, who would like to retain and/or extend their influence with the help of ever most advanced AIs they could afford (and I think life is going to have a little surprise for them). Then we have useful idiots, who consider technobarons demigods - there is no surprise for them, because they just take everything as happening naturally and move on, not knowing what is expected and what is thinking. And of course there are people pouring vitriol on AI, which does not make much sense, if you ask me. Want to pour some? Pour it on the humans who set up AIs and made them act wrongfully. By no means those are not all the groups of humans who have certain attitudes about AI. Just few examples. So, me, I am curious observer. It may seem as I shrug off responsibility for the future, but to be frank, I think humans are still not having discussion about AI that should be had some 20-25 years ago [1]. Nowadays it is more like riding a truck on the ice and we have started to slide (I mean we humans). Maybe there is something to be done about it, or maybe one can just brace oneself and count on one's luck. What could certainly have been done, it was slowing down long ago. Well, all right, it was something that could almost certainly not happen, because rivarly, never, ever. I suspect this is why we are not going to slow down today, so this is it. SHTF, probably one day in our life (which, given we have members of advanced age, is not very long from now, eh). It "always" have puzzled me, that people to whom I had access (nobody really powerfull, only some buddies who might have been more clever than me) did not recognized this incoming future as something worthy a talk. It was actually very same thing with climate change. So, right now, the most rational posture I can come up with is to be curious. [1] What would such discussion look like? I have no idea but I hope I would recognize one when I see one. With caveat that we are rather late to such talking (20-25, remember?). I assume AI is here to stay, no matter if it is real or only marketing invention. It is also going to be developed in more and more advanced shape and with more unwanted########questionable side effects and uses. I think we are at certain limes and after crossing it every and each our favour will be returned, because why not? -- Regards, Tomasz Rola -- ** A C programmer asked whether computer had Buddha's nature. ** ** As the answer, master did "rm -rif" on the programmer's home ** ** directory. And then the C programmer became enlightened... ** ** ** ** Tomasz Rola mailto:[email protected] **
