> On Jun 22, 2021, at 12:40 PM, ben via cctech <cctech@classiccmp.org> wrote: > Lisp is evaluated, not compiled from what little I have read. > If I could read the papers (for free) I could know more. So… have I got this right? 1. You admit directly you have only a little knowledge on the topic. 2. You choose to stand by your uninformed opinion (and dig your heels in deeper, even) instead of accepting information from somebody with more knowledge and/or direct experience, or taking the initiative to learn more about it yourself, before spouting off about it on a public mailing list. Jesus take the wheel. ok bear.
- Early Programming Books Paul Birkel via cctech
- RE: Early Programming Books David Wade via cctech
- RE: Early Programming Books Paul Birkel via cctech
- Re: Early Programming Books Toby Thain via cctech
- Re: Early Programming Books Norman Jaffe via cctech
- RE: Early Programming Bo... Paul Birkel via cctech
- Re: Early Programming Books ben via cctech
- Re: Early Programming Bo... Toby Thain via cctech
- Re: Early Programmin... ben via cctech
- Re: Early Progra... Brent Hilpert via cctech
- Re: Early Progra... r.stricklin via cctech
- Re: Early Progra... ben via cctech
- Re: Early Progra... Paul Koning via cctech
- RE: Early Programming Books David Wade via cctech
- RE: Early Programming Books Paul Birkel via cctech
- Re: Early Programming Bo... Chuck Guzis via cctech
- Re: Early Programmin... Norman Jaffe via cctech
- Re: Early Progra... Cory Heisterkamp via cctech
- Re: Early Progra... Paul Koning via cctech
- RE: Early Progra... Paul Birkel via cctech
- Re: Early Programmin... Chuck Guzis via cctech