----- Forwarded message from Dr Eberhard Lisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 06:25:28 +0200 From: Dr Eberhard Lisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Nigel Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [cctld-discuss] [centr-ga] Question on Accountability Frameworks Stephan, It was already a difficult task to convince the Chris (who was not the leader of the task force) to even get the members of the task force to vote on whether to submit the *INTERIM* report, he preferred to no objection mode. Not all members even voted. I am unaware of any finalization, as the report is clearly interim *AND* even carries a few comments saying that it needs further discussion. ICANN management has indicated to me, when I submitted language that they would like to wait for the guidelines, so I assume I can now resubmit. And I was soooo looking forward to another face to face in New Zealand where we could finalize this. But it *DOES* do wonders to my trust in Chris and the ccNSO. grettings, el -- Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar) [EMAIL PROTECTED] el108-ARIN / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) PO Box 8421 \ / Please send DNS/NA-NiC related e-mail Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/ to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 1/17/06 12:43 AM Nigel Roberts said the following: > In order to answer this question, one would need to have an answer to > the question: "What are ICANN's powers, and whence do they arise", > wouldn't one. This is a question that has been studiously avoided since > Louis Touton's day. > > If I was to guess, I would say that the Guidelines are nothing more than > concessions by ccNSO members towards future contractual negotiations. > > > > Nigel > -- > Nigel Roberts > > Stephan Welzel/Denic wrote: > >> All, >> >> I have a question on the Accountability Frameworks Guidelines and >> assume that mainly the ccNSO members among you will be able to answer it: >> >> At http://www.ccnso.icann.org/announcements/announcement-06jan06.html >> ICANN states: >> >> "On 14 December 2005, the ccNSO Council resolved to publish the >> Accountability Framework Working Group Interim Report as guidelines >> for ccTLD managers to consider when discussing an accountability >> framework with ICANN. On 19 December 2005, the Council published the >> resolution to the ccNSO members list and as seven days has lapsed >> since this publication without objection the guidelines are now >> operational." >> >> Can anyone explain to me >> >> 1. what the statement is supposed to mean that the guidelines are now >> "operational"? >> 2. what kind of procedure it is according to which something becomes >> "operational" if not objected to? >> 3. in what bylaws, guidelines, documents, whatever this procedure is >> outlined? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Stephan >> ----- End forwarded message ----- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Untuk unsubscribe: kirim e-mail ke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dengan Subject: unsubscribe ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
