On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 07:41:26AM +0200, Antonis Tsolomitis wrote: > Στις 23/02/2014 12:38 πμ, ο/η alx έγραψε: > > Antonis Tsolomitis wrote: > > > > Technically, dtwm's behavior is correct. ICCCM specification states > > that if the client sets the icon pixmap, window manager is expected to > > display it. And while applications are encouraged to obtain > > appropriate icon size from WM hints, and supply matching pixmap, they > > are not required to do so. > > I see your point, and the fact that not many app > > developers/maintainers would worry about aesthetics on anything other > > than GNOME/KDE in the near future, but... > > I am not convinced that this is surely the issue. How do you explain > that a firefox installation comes only with one icon, > namely mozicon128.png, which is an 128x128 icon? But the icon of firefox > when minimized is 16x16.
I note that EWMH allows scaling an icon from _NET_WM_ICON... TWM has a similar issue, for which the workaround was to use ForceIcons. HTH, Isaac Dunham ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ cdesktopenv-devel mailing list cdesktopenv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdesktopenv-devel
