Thank you for your work guys!
Us non-programmer-types do appreciate what you guys do!

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 7:04 PM, Ulrich Wilkens <m...@uwilkens.de> wrote:

> On 05/26/18 00:16, Henry Bonath wrote:
>
>> On these new BSD tests are the Patches listed here:
>> https://sourceforge.net/p/cdesktopenv/tickets/70/ going to be built-in?
>> I saw a post on here from I believe around the 1st requesting they be
>> packed in, I'd like to help any way I can as a non-programmer - test
>> perhaps?
>> Thanks!
>>
>
> I've also worked on this patches, although they are not mine.
> I did not take them one by one, because some of them are already applied
> by other patches and some of them would break other platforms.
> But the others are indeed needed. So all of them should be covered by my
> upcoming patches, also tickets 62 and 63.
>
> Best Regards, Ulrich
>
>
>
>> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 6:07 PM, Jon Trulson <j...@radscan.com <mailto:
>> j...@radscan.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     On 05/25/2018 03:17 PM, Ulrich Wilkens wrote:
>>
>>         On 05/25/18 19:12, Jon Trulson wrote:
>>
>>             On 05/25/2018 10:36 AM, Ulrich Wilkens wrote:
>>
>>                 Hello,
>>
>>                 at the moment all BSD and Solaris platforms are broken.
>>                 Even some Linux
>>                 platforms doesn't built anymore. And this is for several
>>                 reasons. The
>>                 error mentioned in the previous mail is only the first
>>                 one. Beside of
>>                 that a lot of new warnings are generated.
>>
>>
>>             Really?  I've seen the warning go from the thousands down to
>>             403 (after my fix for the problem Dietmar reported).  I will
>>             commit that one to master in a few minutes.
>>
>>
>>         Yes, but I'm talking here about the BSD systems. Most, but not
>>         all new
>>         warnings are coming from makedepend which is still in use for BSD.
>>
>>
>>     Right.  I'd love to just get rid of makedepend.  If you could
>>     arrange for clang to do dependencies like what we do for Linux with
>>     gcc/g++...
>>
>>     [...]
>>
>>                 Otherwise its impossible for me to fix the broken systems.
>>
>>
>>             If you are talking about the mass removal of old systems
>>             patches from Chase, we can stop putting those in master,
>>             leaving that free for testing.  Only actual fixes would go
>>             in there, and anything else goes into cde-next-2.  Would
>>             that work for you?
>>
>>
>>         True, I'm talking about Chase's patches. Your suggestion sounds
>>         good.
>>         But we should agree about a starting point. As far as I've seen
>> the
>>         ultrix removal is pending. Should it go into master or cde-next-2?
>>
>>
>>     IMO, mass removal of old OS's should probably be a low priority,
>>     saved for AFTER the next official release, if Chase is up for that.
>>     Such large patches are hard to review and verify, and have the
>>     definite possibility to destabilize things.
>>
>>         Is it possible to merge master and cde-next-2 afterwards? I'm
>>         not very
>>         familiar with git. SVN was able to merge changes automatically
>>         whenever
>>         possible. Can git do this too?
>>
>>
>>     Yes - what I usually do is periodically rebase master onto
>>     cde-next-2 (or whatever topic branch I'm using).  When done, then we
>>     just take the rebased patches and apply them onto master.  This
>>     avoids a merge commit, and any potential merge conflicts (if done
>>     right of course :)
>>
>>
>>             Also, I was not aware you were even trying to do any testing
>>             (or that you were even on the list anymore :)...
>>
>>             Please feel free to let me know when you are doing this kind
>>             of stuff so I can act appropriately in the future.
>>
>>
>>         Well, I'm still doing things from time to time. The first thing
>>         I will
>>         describe in another mail. The other is a port to macOS which is
>>         nearly
>>         ready. It has only two annoying problems left (not in CDE, but
>>         in the
>>         implementation of X11 on macOS).
>>
>>
>>     Nice!
>>
>>
>>             Linux systems will need (by default) to have tirpc-dev
>>             installed now. If thats not the case on your Linux test
>>             systems, you will likely have build problems, just FYI.
>>
>>
>>         Well, the problem is related to tirpc, but its a little bit
>>         different:
>>         glibc has removed support for sunrpc, so /usr/include/rpc is
>> nearly
>>         empty.
>>         For systems using the new glibc tirpc is now mandatory.
>>         Unfortunately
>>         not all places in CDE use tirpc even if its enabled. This is
>>         fixed by my
>>         patches.
>>
>>
>>     Damn, I thought I had all of those... I didn't notice any issues.
>>
>>     Anyway, I think it's fine if you want to start your testing run now.
>>     We'll keep things in cde-next-3 until that's done and your patches
>>     are merged.  Then we can go from there.
>>
>>
>>     [...]
>>
>>     --     Jon Trulson
>>
>>     "But when I'm in command, every mission's a suicide mission."
>>
>>                                    - Zapp Brannigan
>>
>>     ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------
>>     Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>     engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     cdesktopenv-devel mailing list
>>     cdesktopenv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>     <mailto:cdesktopenv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdesktopenv-devel
>>     <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdesktopenv-devel>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdesktopenv-devel mailing list
>> cdesktopenv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdesktopenv-devel
>>
>>
>
> --
> Ulrich Wilkens
> Email: m...@uwilkens.de
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> cdesktopenv-devel mailing list
> cdesktopenv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdesktopenv-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
cdesktopenv-devel mailing list
cdesktopenv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdesktopenv-devel

Reply via email to