On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 21:49 +0100, Egon Willighagen wrote: > On Sunday 28 January 2007, Rajarshi Guha wrote: > > > The downside of this is that it would place such properties from SD files > > > into a special situation > > > > I agree - but it is also true, that the SD tag feature is specific to > > the SDF format. > > The format is very specific... but I do not see why it is different from any > other molecular 'property'... or? I have not worked overly much with these > files; maybe I am missing something...
Given that it seems that only MDLWriter has an extra method to indicate that extra property information should be written, I figured that it would make sense to have a 'special' property called SD_TAGS I admit, my proposal is partly due to laziness :) Invariably I will know the names of my SD tags, so I can always create a temporary HashMap and extract the relevant properties via getProperty() and populate the HashMap and then send it setSdFields(). It just seemed a little convoluted. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajarshi Guha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG Fingerprint: 0CCA 8EE2 2EEB 25E2 AB04 06F7 1BB9 E634 9B87 56EE ------------------------------------------------------------------- How I wish I were what I was when I wished I were what I am. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Cdk-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-user
