Hi all,

Stefan asked last week about coordination bonds (see below)... these
have been long missing in the CDK, though there is certainly room for
them: the IBond extends IElectronContainer, which is flexible in the
number of atoms and the number of electrons involved...

There was discussion on LonePairs involved in dative bonds... but I
like to ask the user community to define important use cases the
support for coordination/dative bonds should support...

Please let us know what you would like to see supported, so that we
can work out a proposal with a wide scope.

Thanx,

Egon


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stefan Kuhn <stefan.k...@ebi.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:02 PM
Subject: [Cdk-devel] Coordination bonds
To: "Developers forum for discussion about the Chemistry Development
Kit (CDK)" <cdk-de...@lists.sourceforge.net>

Hi all,

do we have support for coordination bonds in CDK? If not, how could these be
introduced? As a property on bonds? From my short wikipedia reading I get the
impression it is very similar to "normal" bonds, so it might be appropriate
to have them as such with a property. Any thoughts?

Thanks,

Stefan
--
Stefan Kuhn B. Sc. M. A.
Software Engineer in the Chemoinformatics and Metabolism Team
European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI)
Wellcome Trust Genome Campus
Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD UK
Phone +44 1223 49 2657
Fax +44 (0)1223 494 468
---------- Forwarded message ----------

-- 
Post-doc @ Uppsala University
Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/
Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return on Information:
Google Enterprise Search pays you back
Get the facts.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Cdk-user mailing list
Cdk-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-user

Reply via email to