On 17/04/2010 11:47, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> Christoph already replied to that.
>
> This is a good example on why I value the current process of getting
> code into the released CDK versions: code is reviewed, and more than
> the developer of that functionality decides if the code is 'finished'.
> That way, we reduce the chance of exposing incomplete and/or broken
> functionality to the user.
I agree. It looked like we would be able to finish this but of course a
branch should have been used. I think this code should be archived and
then removed from the CDK.
Cheers,
Chris
--
Dr. Christoph Steinbeck
Head of Chemoinformatics and Metabolism
European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI)
Wellcome Trust Genome Campus
Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD UK
Phone +44 1223 49 2640; Mobile +44 7826 522319
Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor.
... Ovid, Metamorphoses VII, 20/21
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Cdk-user mailing list
Cdk-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-user
