As I said in my other email:
We may want to impose some "stability" on atom types and then go through
subsequent rounds of atomtyping for a molecule until they stabilize.
Cheers,
Chris
On 18/05/2010 23:00, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Mark Rijnbeek <ma...@ebi.ac.uk> wrote:
>> Marcus, a Chebi curator said he really wouldn't regard the N in case no
>> 3. as being part of an amide group. The main features of the structure
>> are the aromatic imidazole ring and the carboxy group. Granted, the
>> carboxy group is electron-withdrawing and may tend to disrupt the
>> delocalisation of the ring electrons but nevertheless he would still
>> regard the system as aromatic.
>
> Ah, interesting case. I think I'll agree with Marcus here. The carboxy
> group is more stable than the matching enol... but ring delocalization
> is even more favorable... tautomerism case.
>
> Good catch. Not easy to detect though... I'll look into it.
>
> Egon
>
>
--
Dr. Christoph Steinbeck
Head of Chemoinformatics and Metabolism
European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI)
Wellcome Trust Genome Campus
Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD UK
Phone +44 1223 49 2640; Mobile +44 7826 522319
Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor.
... Ovid, Metamorphoses VII, 20/21
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Cdk-user mailing list
Cdk-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-user
