Hej Nina, On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Nina Jeliazkova <jeliazkova.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > Being aware it might be controversial and / or time consuming redesign, > can't help to throw this idea in:
:) > 1) Having iterating readers as the basis of all full-file readers, with > basic functionality just splitting the file into records and providing text > buffers for each record iteratively. I like that idea. Can you file a feature request for that against master? > 2) Simple "one-record" readers for actually parsing the one-record content > into a chemical object in memory Not sure what you mean here... > Thus, iterative readers could be the default, and other readers, loading all > the file in memory, are built on top of them, and used only when really > necessary. We only have three iterating readers! :) Egon -- Dr E.L. Willighagen Postdoctoral Researcher Institutet för miljömedicin Karolinska Institutet Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/ LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Cdk-user mailing list Cdk-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-user
