Hi Martin,

I don’t know about 1.4 but there was DoubleBondAcceptingAromaticityDetector.
which is now deprecated… but does what you need. Perhaps that is in 1.4 I can’t 
remember, it’s been in a while.

In 1.5 you pass the model in as an argument along with the ring detection you 
want. In your case

> new Aromaticity(ElectronDontation.daylight(),
>               Cycles.all())

and to avoid exceptions on bucky balls

> new Aromaticity(ElectronDontation.daylight(),
>               Cycles.or(Cycles.all(), Cycles.all(6)))


J

On Jan 20, 2015, at 1:43 PM, Martin Gütlein <guetl...@posteo.de> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> This is yet another question on aromaticity detection. The Hueckel 
> detection in 1.4 seems to be rather strict with rings including 
> heteroatoms:
> * CCN1CCN(CC1)c1cc2n(cc(C(O)=O)c(=O)c2cc1F)C1CC1 (see 
> https://apps.ideaconsult.net/data/depict?search=CCN1CCN%28CC1%29c1cc2n%28cc%28C%28O%29%3DO%29c%28%3DO%29c2cc1F%29C1CC1&smarts=
>  
> )
> * CNc1cnn(-c2cccc(c2)C(F)(F)F)c(=O)c1Cl (see 
> https://apps.ideaconsult.net/data/depict?search=CNc1cnn%28-c2cccc%28c2%29C%28F%29%28F%29F%29c%28%3DO%29c1Cl&smarts=
>  
> )
> 
> I know that there is no common algorithm for detecting aromaticity, and 
> that there are examples where chemists disagree. However, considering 
> these compounds, the chemists in our project (as well as Open Babel, 
> PubChem and Cactvs (see above links)) do think that the rings should be 
> aromatic.
> 
> Can I change the arom detection behaviour? Is there an alternative to 
> the CDKHueckelAromaticityDetector?
> The SmilesParser#isPreservingAromaticity() method does not help me, as 
> we create new compounds with reactions using the ambit-smarts library, 
> and arom detection has to be applied to the products.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Martin
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
> GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
> Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
> Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
> _______________________________________________
> Cdk-user mailing list
> Cdk-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-user

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
_______________________________________________
Cdk-user mailing list
Cdk-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-user

Reply via email to