On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 8:26 PM, John M <john.wilkinson...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anyways, just deployed one to OpenShift running the latest CDK SnapShot with
> some improvements to layout: http://cdkdepict-openchem.rhcloud.com/depict.html
Nice!
> Are there any objections to distributing source/war via github
> ('/cdk/depict') as an app people can deploy locally?
In general not a good idea to share binaries... I rather see a Maven
build that creates the war, and use an FTP server to distribute the
binaries... like with the CDK jar on SourceForge...
That said, I am not sure how GitHub handles this need... but I think
sharing the binaries are a good idea. Why not use SourceForge for
this?
If not clear, I don't have strong arguments against it, but if you
choose GitHub to distribute them, I recommend a separate repository,
outside the source code repos for the CDK Depict project.
Egon
--
E.L. Willighagen
Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT
Maastricht University (http://www.bigcat.unimaas.nl/)
Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/
LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw
Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers
ORCID: 0000-0001-7542-0286
ImpactStory: https://impactstory.org/EgonWillighagen
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Cdk-user mailing list
Cdk-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-user
