On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:44 AM, John M <john.wilkinson...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ultimately it's silly that V2000 and V3000 are considered different but > haven't had time to put them in a single 'MolfileReader' yet.
The formats *are* different, but that does not mean the readers must be too! The MDL formats for reaction lists, etc, also used the V2000 reader. No problem with that, but the formats are just different, though interdependent. That we do have different readers, is mostly historical; sometimes it's just easier to write a reader from scratch, or not to try to make a reader too flexible to support multiple thing, which makes code complexer. That's mostly the reasons why we have different readers for the MDL molfiles versions. Nothing more. Egon -- E.L. Willighagen Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT Maastricht University (http://www.bigcat.unimaas.nl/) Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/ LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers ORCID: 0000-0001-7542-0286 ImpactStory: https://impactstory.org/EgonWillighagen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Cdk-user mailing list Cdk-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-user
