>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Davidsen)
>In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 11 20:17:14 2000
>> >Perhaps cdrecord could print a warning to that effect "warning: media size
>> >exceeds writing capacity of this drive".
>>
>> One main decision for cdrecord is _not_ to have drive property tables
>> compiled into cdrecord. .... Your wish needs to remain a wish ;-)
>No drive property tables need be compiled in, only an option to specify
>the name of the user defined drive properties table. Nothing which
>changes should be compiled in, but the ability to read such a table at
>run time could be.
>I'm *not* saying I think this is a great idea, but if you should decide
>to provide this I believe it should be in the same n,n,n notation used
>elsewhere, not by drive vendor. If the drive does not return good id,
>let the user be responsible for getting the limitations.
What do you believe should be in there ?
Note that if you are pedantic, more than 74 minutes may cause problems...
J�rg
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) J�rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni) If you don't have iso-8859-1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) chars I am J"org Schilling
URL: http://www.fokus.gmd.de/usr/schilling ftp://ftp.fokus.gmd.de/pub/unix
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
