>From: Giuseppe Corbelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Richard A. Smith wrote:
>> Currently he is using working with cdrecord and cdda2wav via pipes. However he
>says that it
>> gets pretty hairy and complicated in some places. He is considering just
>incoporating large
>> portions of cdrecord and cdda2wav source into his program.
>>
>> Would there be any use for a libcdrecord and how much work would it be?
>IMO it would be useful. It's not so difficult to take some routines from
>cdrecord's code, I've done some very little experiment and did not face
>particular difficulties. The only matter is the complete lack of
>documentation. You'll have to guess the effect of many routines.
I've got this question several times.
The answer is:
making it possible to have libcdrecord would force me to do massive changes on the
source code.
- no global vars
- All code must be reentrant.
- People would ask me to support calling of "parts" of the whole thing.
I don't have the time to do this in a reasonable time-frame... sorry.
J�rg
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) J�rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni) If you don't have iso-8859-1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) chars I am J"org Schilling
URL: http://www.fokus.gmd.de/usr/schilling ftp://ftp.fokus.gmd.de/pub/unix
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
