>But if a directory (or drive) is listed in the '-path-list' file (or on the 
>command line) none of its subdirectories can be excluded by listing them in 
>the '-exclude-list' file. Individual files in the subdirectories or even 
>all the files in subdirectories can be excluded but the subdirectories 
>themselves are still created.
>
>For example 'mkisofs -r -J -o cd.iso -graft-points -path-list cdfiles 
>-exclude-list xcdfiles'
>where cdfiles contains
>/Pages/=F:/Pages/
>
>and xcdfiles contains
>F:/Pages/Docs/*.doc
>results in all files with the '.doc' extension in 'F:/Pages/Docs/'  being 
>excluded from the iso. And  'F:/Pages/Docs/*.*' , although the unwanted 
>directory itself is still created, results in an empty directory.

It should work OK - be careful of trailing '/' characters in the
-exclude-list file (or command line) i.e.

F:/Pages/Docs/

will not work, but:

F:/Pages/Docs

should work OK. It definitely works on Unix, and I see no reason why it
shouldn't in the Cygwin environment (although I have no way of testing
this at the moment).

> >As you really want to give mkisofs a list of files to include on the CD,
> >then you might want to look at my 'files' test patch at:
>
>It would be nice to have a front-end that anyone downloading the Cygwin 
>version of cdrtools can use. For Windows users a Unix/Linux test patch is 
>probably not a practical solution. The version you mentioned with the 
>'file' test patch would be by far the easiest version to deal in creating a 
>front-end, at least in Win32. The user could be presented with a File 
>Explorer-like form where they could drag and drop the directories and files 
>they want recorded to a CD. Then the variable array holding their choices 
>is written to the '-files-list' file (or whatever the option name is). Has 
>there been enough interest expressed to include this alternate version of 
>MKISOFS in the cdrtools package?

The patch is a source code patch, so it should work fine under Cygwin -
of course, you need the Cygwin development stuff (and be able to patch and
rebuild mkisofs), not just the runtime code ...

I have had hardly any feedback on the test patch - it still needs a lot of
work before it could be considered to be included in mkisofs ... I don't
really want to spend time on it, if hardly anyone is interested ...

James Pearson


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to