In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Crane)
>>I noticed future support for udf/packet writing format is missing from the todo >>list. Is this intentional? > > The usual action in such a case is to search the other Announcements in the same > directory, so what is your problem? No "problem" -- had you decided to drop plans for this as a future feature, one imagines you might have simply removed it from your 'TODO' list. I cannot find any recent messages on this mailing list from you regarding changes for udf support in cdrecord, hence the question. Maybe you should state your cdrecord/udf plans here explicitly? Regards Tom. -- Tom Crane, Dept. Physics, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham Hill, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, England. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPAN: 19.875 Fax: +44 (0) 1784 472794 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
