On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Meino Christian Cramer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got :
>
>
> solfire:[mccramer]> which cdrecord
> /usr/bin/cdrecord
> solfire:[mccramer]> ls -l /usr/bin/cdrecord
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 bin bin 266168 Apr 16 16:08 /usr/bin/cdrecord
> solfire:[mccramer]> /usr/bin/cdrecord --version
> Cdrecord 1.11a19 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2002 J�rg Schilling
J�rg did probably upload the wrong version of cdrecord.
Or there is no obvious relation between cdrtool and cdrecord.
> solfire:[mccramer]>
>
> Furthermore:
>
> solfire:[mccramer]> mkisofs
> mkisofs: Missing pathspec.
> Usage: mkisofs [options] file...
>
> Use |���4 -help
> to get a list of valid options.
It was probably one of the last bugs of mkisofs that the message was readable. ;-)
Now you are urged to do some further investigations.
>
> J�rg, I know, that calling mkisofs without any params makes not much sense,
> but the scrambled output of mkisofs do not make it either...
>
> I am as sure as Anssi, that I had deleted old versions of cdrtools before.
>
> TuX ruleZ!
> Meino
One last question:
Will there ever be a beta version of 1.11?
That is that thingy that comes _after_ alpha and can be tested by so-called
beta-testers.
I.e. people who are aware that they may lose their whole HD data if they test a
software.
Alpha software is just (as I recall it from all other software) for inhouse testing on
isolated
computers.
But J�rg did somehow invert the versioning scheme (beta -> alpha -> release)???
Regards
Carsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
