On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 10:36:01PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: > >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 13 22:18:40 2002 > > >On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 01:13:58PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote: > >> On Mon, 13 May 2002, Joerg Schilling wrote: > >> > It prints: "File %s is too large - ignoring\n" > >> > It is not possible to put files > 2 GB into a ISO-9660 fs. > >> > >> What about UDF? > > >Just curring symptoms. If UDF than NO ISO at all. But mkisofs can't > >switch of ISO. So i don't use UDF. > > All UDF media should include ISO-9660. mkisofs is correct.
"Should" is the jumping dot. All files names SHOULD not contain this or that characters. All file names should be 8.3 (or 20/32 Chars?). My filenames are too long. My filenames aren't Windows compatible. (Windows refuses to read the files. I had to use "isobuster" to copy a file off one of my DVD-Rs once) So why should i be so "compatible" to put an ISO onto the Disc? Some days ago i even thought about using romsfs, cramfs, FAT or something else. Linux can read everything. -> No problem for Linux means no problem for me. I even burned tar-files directly to CD-r in the past. All or nothing. UDF means that the ISO can have lesser files than the UDF part -> no ISO at all. A missing file isn't acceptable. Bis denn -- Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
