>From: Andreas Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> You can't GPL part of your program however, and have GPL
>> incompatible code linked into it.
This statement is not correct
>I tend to believe this but can you please let me know where this is
>stated in the GPLv2 license text (I mean the part about making
>restrictions to the license). I'm assuming here that you are
>quiet familiar with this topic so that it is easy for you to find it.
>I already scanned the license text but could not find something
>matching.
If you are the author you may put the under whatever license you like.
The _real_ problem with cdrdao is that a lot of projects including
cdrecord have been are are abused by commercial companies that take
GPLd SW and illegally use it as closed source. Now that cdrdao did the
oposite (it tried to illegally put open source but not GPLd code
under GPL) it throws bad light on GPLd SW.
Also please keep in mind that as you published libedc with an incompatble
license it is questionable that Heiko will put libedc under GPL before
all current illegal users found out what happened.
J�rg
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) J�rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni) If you don't have iso-8859-1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) chars I am J"org Schilling
URL: http://www.fokus.gmd.de/usr/schilling ftp://ftp.fokus.gmd.de/pub/unix
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
