On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Joerg Schilling wrote: >Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 12:07:44 +0200 (CEST) >From: Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: License of cdrdao will be changed > >>From: "Mike A. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>without the "viral" component, then as far as I can see it would be=20 >>>>possible. This would however change the license terms for the rest=20 >>>>of cdrdao as well (it would effectively turn into an LGPL license I=20 >>>>think). >>> >>>It will not as the exception is limited to the edc library. > >>The GPL explicitly disallows additional restrictions in section 6. > >Wrong: > >Please read section 6 completely. It only applies to "redistributions". >Andreas is responsible to the primary distribution.
Precicely. Which means Andreas could legally do whatever he wants, but nobody else can then build the software and redistribute it. And that is what I was saying. -- Mike A. Harris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
