[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Meino Christian Cramer) quoted and then wrote: > what I heard one time was, that if burnfree is triggered by a buffer > underrun (which cause the laser beam to pause), a small (very small) > gap is produced after the beam is switched on afterwards. > > A "master" produced that way cannot be used as a real master for > professional mass production. > > For any other usage it is as good as others. > > If one would ask me: > I prefer a not-so-absolutely-pefect but working burned CD in opposite > to coasters.... > > May be I am not a purist... ;O)
Or perhaps you are not in the habit of supplying CDs for mass production. > keep hacking! > Meino > >lsorense> On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:18:54AM +0100, Isidro Cachadi?a >Guti?rrez wrote: >lsorense> > This is a wish. Why the burnfree option is disabled by default?. >lsorense> > Why is not enabled by default? >lsorense> >lsorense> Some drives drop their max write speed when it is enabled. I >don't know >lsorense> if the linking system used by the burnfre systems can cause any >lsorense> compatibility problems with picky readers either. Either one >would be a >lsorense> good reason to not use it by default. If your machine is fast >enough, >lsorense> you don't need it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
