>From: Thomas Plank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> ASPI was default for several years. You changed this behavior.
>I'm not satisfied by changing this behavior too.
>I namely do not have any problems with the SPTI method (perhaps because
>I'm using NT 5.1) but what about all other users?
First an important note: we need to test the code. It it is not the
default, then it would remain untested.
>Why isn't ASPI default and SPTI the new possible access version?
Because otherwise, NT dumb users would not realize that it may work without
now.
>And I additionally have in mind all users of win95/98/ME, there's no
>chance to get SPTI to work.
It has been proved to work on win98 without problems using the same
dev= strings as before.
>I strongly stand up for making ASPI again the default method.
It it blue screens Nt-4.0, then it makes sense to either find a workaround
(other software seems to be able to do also) or introduce a hack that makes
ASPI the default on NT-4.0
J�rg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) J�rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni) If you don't have iso-8859-1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) chars I am J"org Schilling
URL: http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/usr/schilling ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
