> Why is it soo hard to understand that you cannot divide by 64 while > the smallest directory entry is 34 bytes and most real life entries > are still smaller than 64 bytes?
I'm fairly certain I'm dividing by 32. The second patch has the following:
block << 6
which is the same as
block << (11 - 5)
which (assuming arbitrary precision) is the same as
(block << 11) >> 5
which is the byte offset divided by 32. So, the math was correct from the start, right?
> Code that creates st_ino == 0 or that gives away non-unique inode > numbers is inaceptable.
If the math above is o.k., I'll be happy to go back to the approach in the second patch.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
