>From: Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
WARNING: if you continue to include an illegal reply email address in your
mailings, you will be ignored in future!
>> >Can you be more specific about the bugs please? Or does that "contain
>> >bugs" simply refer to that they're not the latest alpha version?
>>
>> Patches that don't follow the conceptional design of complex data structures
>> easily break functions that the author of the patch is not aware of.
>In the past so many years cdrecord has always worked for me, but I
>haven't tried their latest version.
I am talking about the patches tha are intended to implement DVD writing.
>> SuSE implements a "device manager" deamon that opens device nodes for other
>> programs. This daemon is less secure than cdrecord/libscg as libscg
>> does far more than a simple string compare/pattern matching on the device
>> node
>> name.
>Your alternative requires cdrecord to be SUID root, which from my point
>of view (not knowing the details about either) isn't any safer than
>resmgr (programmed by a professional + paid security person). IMHO it
Well, why then SuSE does not hire a professional for help?
The SuSE hack is definitely less secure than an official cdrecord version.
J�rg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) J�rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni) If you don't have iso-8859-1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) chars I am J"org Schilling
URL: http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/usr/schilling
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
