On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 12:19:17PM +1300, Volker Kuhlmann wrote: > > this was a modified version of cdrecord (or at least not clear > > enough as far as J�rg's concerned) which according to J�rg violates > > section 2a of the GPL. Hence his calling it illegal.
Well, I think it's pretty lame to have done a s/cdrecord/dvdrecord/, but no s/Cdrecord/Dvdrecord/ in the manpage at least. It always says cdrecord, but that is not the program. The binary even says it's cdrecord. If it's a different program, it should clearly say so, and not be confusing. It's just sloppy. -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
