>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 28 17:11:59 2004
>>
>> Cdrecord does not squeeze the drive....
>Did I say that cdrecord "squeezes the drive"? No! If I wanted to say
Of course you did!
You wrote that growisofs works in contrary to cdrecord besauce it does _not_
"squeezes the drive".
This meant that cdrecord "squeezes the drive".
>> You did not answer if growisofs always checks the SCSI Status byte.
>There was no question "if growisofs always checks the SCSI Status byte"
>[in fact I fail to find any question posed by you in previous post]. But
>I think this unasked question was indirectly answered. Indeed, doesn't
>"if growisofs didn't pay attention to the error code returned by the
>command in question, [it would work at all]" mean "growisofs does pay
>attention"? A.
I still cannot see that this question has been answered.
J�rg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) J�rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni) If you don't have iso-8859-1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) chars I am J"org Schilling
URL: http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/usr/schilling
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
