> If it's write-once, it needs a simulation mode, IMHO. A while ago I would have unconditionally agreed. Now I ask whether an erasable would do the same trick. It's also a question of media cost - currently 4.7G media is cheap enough to not worry too much about a coaster.
> On the other hand, growisofs never reports possible underrun conditions > - at least according to my cursory examination of its code. Perhaps it > should do so - especially if it is being used with DVD- media - even if > for no other reason than that we can use this information to evaluate > the tuning of our systems. If the quality of DVD- media which was burnt with underruns is indeed more questionable, then an indication of whether such a condition occured would be handy. It probably boils down to the usual thing: someone has to implement it... Volker -- Volker Kuhlmann is possibly list0570 with the domain in header http://volker.dnsalias.net/ Please do not CC list postings to me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
