Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Go Red! :^) ...and thanks for the reply. I have found that the
> > -speed=1 causes a working 4x burn, (while -speed=4 cryptically
> > causes a 6x attempted burn with failure.) I suppose I will just
> > have to live with 4x for a while as I'm not willing to move to
> > 2.6 yet. Unless you know of an ide-scsi patch? I have tried
> > some searches with no results....
>
> That's easy, speed=4 doesn't mean 4x, it means the 4th supported speed
> in the list of capabilities. So:
Wrong: speed=4 means 4x. The drive decides what to do with this request.....
do not blame cdrecord.
J�rg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) J�rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
