> Looks like you did not get my point: why should there be a need > to use a non GPL variant?
I can think of a simple reason: to grant rights which the GPL doesn't grant, in return for some cash for further development. There probably are other valid reasons too. [cdrecord license:] > As you are on this list for a long time, I would expect that you know > that a company was named only because this company did violate the GPL. The version of cdrecord shipped by named company was clearly marked as modified, only you would expect a command line application to pop up a window in everyone's face saying so. Incidentally, you're also the only one who thinks the GPL was violated in the first place. Does that tell you something? And I can't help but notice that you made a special license of your own software for someone while continuing to ask "why should there be a need to use a non GPL variant?". Glass house, stones. Volker -- Volker Kuhlmann is possibly list0570 with the domain in header http://volker.dnsalias.net/ Please do not CC list postings to me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
